Recently I was lucky enough to attend an online reveal of the latest LEGO® House exclusive set, 40505 LEGO Building Systems, with the opportunity to ask some questions to the set's designers, Stuart Harris (LEGO House Master Builder) and Markus Rollbüller (Senior Designer at The LEGO Group).
Products in this article were gifted by The LEGO Group; the author's opinions are their own.
This article contains affiliate links to LEGO.com; we may get a small commission if you purchase.
40505 LEGO Building Systems
699DKK
1211 parts
Released 1st March 2024, available exclusively from LEGO House in Billund, Denmark.
Historical background
Developing the models
Turn the model round and you see 19 nanoscale builds of iconic sets from the back catalogue.
The first arched alcove represents:
- The classic Wooden Duck
- 700 Automatic Binding Bricks
- Wooden Fire Truck
- 651 1:87 Truck (Yellow version)
- 127 Complete Train With 3 Wagons
- 375 Castle
- LEGO DUPLO 511 Building Set
- LEGO Technic 850 Fork-Lift Truck
- 928 Galaxy Explorer
- LEGO DUPLO 2705 Passenger Train
- 6285 Black Seas Barracuda
- LEGO DUPLO 2655 Farm Set
- LEGO Technic 8480 Space Shuttle
- 9719 Robotics Invention System (LEGO® MINDSTORMS)
- LEGO® BIONICLE® 8534 Tahu and canister
- LEGO® NINJAGO® 70751 Temple of Airjitsu
- LEGO® Ideas 21318 Ideas Tree House
- LEGO Technic 42108 Mobile Crane
- LEGO® Friends 41095 Emma's House
- An empty spot for you to build a favourite set of your own
Parts of note
The set includes a handful of noteworthy elements:
- 1x Tile 1x8 with 'LEGO Building Systems' print in Black (6471563 | 4162pr) - new and exclusive to this set
- 1x Tile 1x8 with 'LEGO House' print in Black (6320270 | 70696) - also in 2 other LEGO House exclusive sets, 40504 A Minifigure Tribute and 40563 Tribute to LEGO House
- 14x Wheel 11 x 8 with Center Groove in Red (6467942 | 42610) - a recolour unique to this set
- 2x Plant, Flower, Plate Round 1x1 with 5 Petals in Earth Green/Dark Green (6446790 | 24866) - only in 21060 Himeji Castle
- 3x Technic Brick 1x1 with Axle Hole in Medium Nougat (6457557 | 73230) - previously in 43224 King Magnifico's Castle and 43230 Walt Disney Tribute Camera
- 4x Plate 1x1 in Lavender (6099363 | 3024) - appears in 31149 Flowers in Watering Can, 41734 Sea Rescue Boat and 41735 Mobile Tiny House
- 3x Cone 1x1 [Top Groove] in Dark Green (6411591 | 59900) - also in 10325 Alpine Lodge, Himeji Castle and 10308 Holiday Main Street
- 1x Bar 1L with Clip [Cut Edges and One Side Hole] [Full Clip] in Bright Blue/Blue (6439050 | 3484) - seen in 42616 Heartlake City Music Talent Show, 10326 Natural History Museum and the slightly older variant is also in 10313 Wildflower Bouquet
- 6x Window 1 x 2 x 2 Plane, Single Hole Top and Bottom for Glass in Red (6467937 | 60032) - a new Element ID for an existing element which was last seen once in 2020 in 70436 Phantom Fire Truck 3000 and between 2010-2013 in 6 other sets.
Q&A
New Elementary was one of several RLFM to attend the online reveal. Here are a few more questions asked during the Q&A.
New Elementary: Do you find it difficult to switch between scales when designing sets, since the mindset for microscale is quite different to minifigure scale or even larger?New Elementary: Are there any building techniques that you are particularly proud of?
BrickNerd: How is the subject of the model determined prior to Stuart building the sketch models?
BrickNerd: Has there ever been a set that included elements from all three building systems at the same time?
Stuart: The very first LEGO DUPLO sets in the 1960s came with 8 LEGO System bricks, and plenty of sets include both LEGO System and LEGO Technic, of course. [Update: 7623 Temple Escape included a DUPLO ball as well as System and Technic].
Closing Thoughts
As a big fan of microscale, the main models and the nanoscale ones on the shelves are delightful little builds which replicate their larger counterparts extremely well at such a small scale. The red, yellow and blue accents given to each building system also echo some of the original colours of LEGO bricks, which is a nice touch.
I was initially disappointed that the "DUPLO" brick on the back wall was actually a LEGO System-built version rather than the real thing. The question as to why it wasn't DUPLO was posed at the Q&A, but never answered directly by the team. Having built the set, I have a hunch as to why.
DUPLO bricks are twice as large in every dimension as System bricks, making a real DUPLO 2x2 brick 4x4 System modules along on each side. However, to maintain the gray back wall for the alcove, and the fact that there are only 3 modules of depth available, a real DUPLO brick would not have fitted as it would have stuck out the back, leaving an unsightly yellow section protruding out of the alcove.
As Markus encouraged us to share our own nanoscale builds, I have chosen to make a tiny version of 21309 NASA Apollo Saturn V. I'm a big space nut, and it was also one of the very first sets I bought myself as I was coming out of my Dark Ages in 2017, finally admitting that I was an AFOL. It meant rearranging the models in the last alcove a little bit, but they all fitted rather nicely in the end.
I think this set is squarely aimed at LEGO nerds like me who love the history of the brick, and as such I hope its intended audience will appreciate the thought and Easter eggs which have gone into every aspect of the design. Even the building instructions contain some fascinating facts about the 3 building systems – as well as mentioning Modulex and Constraction themes!
Therefore, I don't think the model will be as popular with the general public visiting LEGO House as some of the other iconic sets in the series, such as the Wooden Duck or Minifigure Tribute.
READ MORE: What are the new LEGO® parts for March 2024?
Help New Elementary keep publishing articles like this. Become a Patron!
A huge thank you to all our patrons for your support, especially our 'Vibrant Coral' tier: London AFOLs, Antonio Serra, Beyond the Brick, Huw Millington, Big B Bricks, Dave Schefcik, David and Breda Fennell, Gerald Lasser, Baixo LMmodels, Sue Ann Barber and Trevor Clark, Markus Rollbühler, Elspeth De Montes, Megan Lum, Andy Price, Chuck Hagenbuch, Jf, Wayne R. Tyler, Daniel Church, Lukas Kurth (StoneWars), Timo Luehnen and our newest patron, Chris Wight! You folks are just the cutest little baby bows.
LEGO® Shop at Home
USA: FREE SHIPPING every day on orders over $35!
UK: Free delivery when you spend £50 or more at LEGO!
Australia:
Discover the latest promotions and offers on LEGO.com
All text and images are © New Elementary unless otherwise attributed.
I really love the 853 carchassis microbuild! The upside-down us of parts does it!
ReplyDeleteGreat article Caz, thanks.
ReplyDeleteHere's Lego rewriting History again, calling "original" 2 systems that they initially stole. I'd have more respect for Lego if it was acknowledging its origins.
ReplyDeleteThey do acknowledge Kiddicraft if that’s what you mean and LEGO developed from Hilary Page’s original concept to be what it is today: .
DeleteYeah maybe somewhere if you read the fineprint, but that's not what the story the back of that box seems to tell
DeleteAll of these systems were after the development of tubes from the original slotted bricks. Although there was a period of tubeless bricks in the earlier sets, LEGO are not reinventing history, it did develop the tube system. Im a huge Kiddicraft fan but I dont think there's always a reason to bring it up.
DeleteWrong. Technics was also a ripoff of Philiform.
DeleteThere's no reason to bring it up unless they're talking about Lego's history.
Also there's a reason for us to keep bringing it up, because Lego is certainly not happy that other brands exist. I keep being reminded it when customs seize my perfectly legit sets (like, Sembo) from China because Lego works along with them.
I had never heard of Philiform before now, but looking it up the comparison to Technic definitely is more of a stretch—while they were achieving similar things with use of things like axles and gears to create movement, Technic is hardly a direct copy of Philiform's parts or system (unlike early Lego copying Kiddicraft, or Sembo pretty much directly copying existing Technic parts).
DeleteIt's never YOUR interest to be against "copying" in the LEGO world anyway. Other brands are full of great parts that LEGO doesn't have, just imagine now that maybe you'll never gonna get them as LEGO because they've been patented.
DeleteImagine not getting 1x5 plates (that LEGO did try to patent lol) because another brand had patented them.
And if you're gonna say that "1x5 plates" aren't a revolution, they're just basic plates, yeah totally. Same thing with "the tubes" that weren't any revolutionnary. In fact, side notches on anything "1 by x" is a lot better than stupid tubes (as tubes require hollow studs, that LEGO doesn't like because it doesn't show their brand, while side notches accomodate for all studs). Large tubes are ok for bricks, but that's never what we're all interested in.
I used to be a purist, now I'm all in "the bricks system", which I would sum up as a set of metrics and rules, that LEGO didn't "invent", and also some (like colors) that LEGO did "invent", but that's called History and having to cope with that isn't called copying, it's called backwards compatibility.
And in that "bricks system" trust me that there exists better (and worse) than LEGO, better subsystems (like, brackets, slopes), better quality (like, parts without injection marks, or parts moulded as they should have been).
That sounds interesting. You should start a blog where you can write all this down as much as you want. Somewhere else.
DeleteLego calling them something like "the two original systems" (paraphrasing) is like Nike saying the Waffle Racer is " the original shoe model". With that phrase they're not claiming to have invented shoes, just talking about the first ones from their company. Likewise, I find absolutely nothing objectionable to Lego talking about their first systems. They might be avoiding talking about who invented what, but they're not lying about it.
DeleteThe comparison with Nike doesn't work, as Lego didn't copy "interlocking blocks", they existed way way before, way before Kiddicraft. They copied the Kiddicraft brick. What defines the Lego system the most, which is metrics, is something we owe to Kiddicraft.
DeleteWhat you may argue that Lego created isn't the tubes, but rather the 1/3 plate division (and I'm not even sure about that).
Blocks + metrics = "Lego" system. Lego as a brand is something else, it's an image, it's the symbolic minifigure, and much more. But the Lego system is the Kiddicraft system, and they didn't invent it.
In a hundred years, "Lego's" will still be around as many many more parts, but you know what's not gonna change? The metrics of a brick.
Lego also created their own bricks, and where is Modulex now? That's right, it proves that metrics and compatibility is key.